Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Archuleta (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv03247
Plaintiff:
Joseph Archuleta
Defendant:
Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil, Xaviera Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Hendrix
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Jennifer Hansen and Jared Polis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smilanic (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv03052
Defendant:
Moses Stancil
Plaintiff:
Jacob J. Smilanic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmi v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Eric Alrdidge and Moses Stancil
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Reba Emmi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Hammock
as 24-1404
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH D. HAMMOCK
Respondent:
BARRY GOODRICH, Warden, Crowley County Correctional Institute and MOSES STANCIL, Executive Director of Colorado Department of Corrections
Emmi v. Dotson et al
as 1:2024cv02778
Defendant:
Eric Alrdidge, Moses Stancil and Chadwick Dotson
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Reba Emmi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeiser v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1389
Respondent:
MOSES STANCIL, CDOC Executive Director, PHIL WEISER, Attorney General for the State of Colorado and WARDEN OF SCF
Petitioner:
SAMUEL O.P. YEISER
Wind (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv02740
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yapoujian (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv02725
Defendant:
Jackson, Moses Stancil, Holman and others
Plaintiff:
Alishan Yapoujian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaves (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv02710
Petitioner:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
