Cases 1 - 5 of 5
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Ranbaxy Inc et al
as 1:2020cv11023
Plaintiff:
MSPA Claims 1 LLC, MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and SERIES PMPI
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC,et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv12343
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, SERIES PMPI and MSPA Claims 1 LLC
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Stryker Corporation of Michigan and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC et al v. Liberty Mutual Holding Company et al
as 1:2017cv10564
Plaintiff:
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC , MSP Recovery, LLC and MSPA Claims 1, LLC
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Holding Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC et al v. Liberty Mutual Holding Company et al
as 1:2017cv10563
Plaintiff:
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC , MSP Recovery, LLC and MSPA Claims 1, LLC
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Holding Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
