Cases 1 - 10 of 109
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HYLTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03732
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HYLTON v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv03654
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BRITTANY NYAMEKYE and others
GREGORY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
MS. CHE' GREGORY and CHE' GREGORY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DC GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
