Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 14-1151
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Murray Energy Corporation, et al v. Secretary of Labor, et al
as 14-12163
Petitioner:
MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THE OHIO VALLEY COAL COMPANY and others
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Murray Energy Corporation, et al v. MSHA
as 14-3427
Petitioner:
MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION, THE OHIO VALLEY COAL COMPANY and others
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Murray Energy Corporation et al v. Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency
as 5:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Murray Energy Corporation , Murray American Energy, Inc. , The American Coal Company and others
Defendant:
Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Murray Energy Corporation, et al v. MSHA, et al
as 13-3325
Petitioner:
MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, OHIO AMERICAN ENERGY, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Murray Energy Corporation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 11-1359
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation, American Energy Corporation, Ohio Valley Coal Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Lisa Perez Jackson
Murray Energy Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 09-1207
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation, American Energy Corporation and Consolidated Land Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
EnCana Marketing (USA) Inc., Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, Ultra Resources Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
