Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Rucker v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Michael Snyder, Will Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arroyo, et al v. Myers, et al
as 23-1137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEREK MYERS
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, TIMOTHY HOLCOMB, JOSHUA MOORE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Myers v. Tufuga, et al
as 22-4027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN MYERS and NATHAN BEN MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
BEN TUFUGA, TRAVIS WILLINGER, JUSTIN GRAY and others
Clervrain et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Fabrice Thomas and others
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Howie Morales, Alicia J Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County et al
as 4:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ashley Myers and Courtney Vaughn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County, Scott Walton, Kellie Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
