Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mark McCowan v. Myron Batts
as 21-5172
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK E. MCCOWAN
Respondent / Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden
Charles Keller v. Myron Batts, et al
as 20-6322
Defendant / Appellee:
E. KESSEL, Unit Manager FCI Memphis. In his official and individual capacity., MYRON L. BATTS, Warden FCI Memphis. In his official and individual capacity., CAPTAIN JEMISON, FCI Memphis. In his official and individual capacity. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES DERRICK KELLER
Roy Mosley v. Myron Batts, et al
as 19-5355
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] PARKER, Acting Captain, MYRON L. BATTS, Warden FCI Memphis and [UNKNOWN] ROBERTS, SIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MOSLEY
Gregory Gough v. Myron Batts
as 19-5207
Respondent / Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY THOMAS GOUGH
James Morris v. Myron Batts
as 16-6806
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden
John Futch v. Myron Batt
as 16-11562
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Jonathan Marshall, Sr. v. Myron Batts, et al
as 16-11409
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, State of Texas
Terence Motley v. Myron Batt
as 16-6178
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE G. MOTLEY, aka Terence G. Motley, aka Terrence Motley
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, FCI Memphis
John Futch v. Myron Batt
as 16-10267
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Big Spring
Jerry Dedrick v. Myron Batts, et al
as 15-10969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
