Cases 11 - 20 of 59
MACTRUONG et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
DMT MACTRUONG, NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Defendant:
RONALD DESANTIS, WEBSTER BARNABY, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mac Truong v. Lakeland Bank, et al
as 22-1946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. MAC TRUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKELAND BANK, LAKELAND BANCORP INC, ALTHEA HOWARD and others
Mac Truong, et al v. Marc Jean-Baptiste
as 22-1678
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG, SALEM JACQUES, CLAUDY JEAN-BAPTISTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALIM JACQUES
Defendant / Appellee:
MARC JEAN-BAPTISTE
TRUONG v. LAKELAND BANK et al
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
DR. MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
LAKELAND BANK, LAKELAND BANCORP, INC., ALTHEA HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
TRUONG v. JEAN-BAPTISTE
as 2:2021cv17606
Plaintiff:
DR. MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
MARC JEAN-BAPTISTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUONG et al v. JEAN-BAPTISTE
as 2:2021cv12997
Plaintiff:
SALEM JACQUES, MARIE-BETTY JEAN-BAPTISTE, MARLENE JEAN-BAPTISTE and others
Defendant:
MARC JEAN-BAPTISTE
Petitioner:
Mr. EMMANUEL COFFY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mac TruongIn re: Mac Truong
as 21-1171
Debtor:
In re: MAC TRUONG
Appellee:
R. KENNETH BARNARD
Not Yet Classified:
ROSEMARY I. MERGENTHALER
Mac TruongIn re: Mac Truong
as 21-1172
Not Yet Classified:
In re: MAC TRUONG
Appellant:
ROSEMARY I. MERGENTHALER
Appellee:
R. KENNETH BARNARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00074
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In re: Rosemary Mergenthaler
as 19-2562
Appellant:
Ruediger Albrecht, Marc Truong and Mac Truong
Appellee:
United States Trustee and R. Kenneth Barnard
Debtor:
In re: Rosemary Ida Mergenthaler
Not Yet Classified:
Rosemary Ida Mergenthaler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
