Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Machuca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10214
Plaintiff:
Michelle Machuca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Martinez Machuca et al
as 1:2022cv03250
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Julian I Martinez Machuca doing business as Catrinas Mexican Grill and Catrinas on Third Avenue Inc. doing business as Catrinas Mexican Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Green v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06729
Plaintiff:
Mike Green
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane OHaver and others
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Wang v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10143
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
Machuca v. Jones
as 1:2020cv03899
Respondent:
Gerard Jones
Petitioner:
Marvin R. Machuca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
