Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Buetenmiller et al v. Macomb County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv11031
Plaintiff:
Stacey Glass, Samantha Bills and Rebekah Buetenmiller
Defendant:
William Horan, John Does, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2019cv13544
Plaintiff:
Zachary Poole
Defendant:
Macomb County, Ryan Stateler and William Hoppe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde v. Kass et al
as 2:2019cv13403
Defendant:
Deputy Nowak, Jason Kass, Deputy Dominka and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Macomb County et al
as 3:2019cv11701
Defendant:
Macomb County and Rob Leonetti
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2019cv11531
Defendant:
Anthony Wickersham, Bill Dwyer, Macomb County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
LaTausha Simmons
Mawer v. Macomb County Community Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2018cv12398
Plaintiff:
Craig Mawer and Jeremy Berra through his Guardian, Connie Berra
Defendant:
Macomb County Community Mental Health Services and John KINCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malik Jeter v. Macomb County et al
as 4:2018cv12338
Defendant:
Nurse Parton, Deputy Holmes, Deputy Franks and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Jeter, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Antoine Jeter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2018cv11248
Plaintiff:
Dequan Flowers
Defendant:
County of Macomb , Brandon Medlow , James Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puffpaff v. Labish et al
as 2:2018cv10453
Plaintiff:
Heather Puffpaff
Defendant:
Scott Labish , Deputy Lockaby and Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dedes v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2018cv10082
Plaintiff:
Charles Dedes
Defendant:
Macomb County, Stevina Allen, Daniel Zaliwski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
