Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER v. MULTIPLAN, INC.
as 3:2017cv05967
Plaintiff:
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
MULTIPLAN, INC. , NIPPON EXPRESS USA, INC , GM FINANCIAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FANNING v. MACY'S, INC.
as 1:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
MACY'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. MACY'S, INC.
as 1:2016cv02474
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
MACY'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Morris v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2016cv01243
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Macy's Inc and Group Policy Number VDT-980012
Plaintiff:
Cynthia G Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Mansingh v. Macy's Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02756
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hunter and Krishna Mansingh
Defendant:
I. Williams Associates, Inc., Joseph Eletto Transfer, Inc. and Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Humberto Tapia v. Macy's Inc et al
as 2:2014cv05163
Defendant:
Bloomingdale's Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Humberto Tapia
Eloy Paulino v. Macy's Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04854
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services Inc., Does, Macy's Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eloy Paulino
Dineiro v. Bloomingdale's Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv04072
Plaintiff:
Esther Dineiro
Defendant:
Bloomingdale's Inc. and Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gilson v. Macy's Inc Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 3:2013cv04520
Plaintiff:
Kymberlee Gilson
Defendant:
Macy's Inc Long Term Disability Plan and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Carsello v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2013cv03749
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Carsello
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Macy's, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
