Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Douglas Walgren, et al v. Stephen Madden, et al
as 19-1465
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NAPERVILLE, BRETT HEUN, JAMES KONRAD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS WALGREN, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Corey Walgren, Deceased and MAUREEN WALGREN
Maria Rosas v. Advocate Christ Hospital and M, et al
as 19-1434
Defendant / Appellee:
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, a Cook County Hospital, CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, and agency of the City of Chicago, MADDEN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, A State of Illinois Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA M. ROSAS
ROMERO v. MADDEN
as 4:2018cv00017
Defendant:
JAMIE MADDEN
Plaintiff:
SHELLY ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1989 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv08354
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept 15th Dist., Roberta Walker, April Louise Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Madden v. Crown Asset Management, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06813
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Madden
Defendant:
Crown Asset Management, LLC and Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Steven Madden
as 15-3344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN H. MADDEN
USA v. Steven Madden
as 15-3255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN H. MADDEN
Meyer v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv04812
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer
Defendant:
Megan Miller, Michelle Obama , Malia Ann Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
