Other Personal Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Madden v. Abate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00145
Plaintiff: Samantha Madden and Samantha Madden
Defendant: Joseph Abate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Simplot Phosphates LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00098
Plaintiff: Gamaliel Daniel Walker
Defendant: Simplot Phosphates LLC and Tracy Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lauria et al v. Mandalay Corp. et al
as 2:2008cv01116
Plaintiff: Patricia Lauria and Steve Madden, LTD
Defendant: Mandalay Corp., World Shoe Association, World Shoe Association and others
Counter Claimant: World Shoe Association
Counter Defendant: Patricia Lauria and Steven Madden, LTD.
Cross Claimant: World Shoe Association, World Shoe Association and Mandalay Corp.
Cross Defendant: Mandalay Corp., World Shoe Association and World Shoe Association
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Maddens v. Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated
as 2:2008cv12383
Plaintiff: Joseph Maddens and Joseph Maddens
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Powers v. City of Conroe et al
as 4:2008cv00842
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Powers
Defendant: City of Conroe, Conroe Police Department, Charlie Ray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
LAURIA et al v. MANDALAY CORP. et al
as 3:2007cv00817
Plaintiff: PATRICIA LAURIA and STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
Defendant: MANDALAY CORP., WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION and WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION
Counter Claimant: WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION
Counter Defendant: PATRICIA LAURIA and STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
Cross Claimant: WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION, WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION and MANDALAY CORP.
Cross Defendant: MANDALAY CORP., WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION and WORLD SHOE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?