Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Moussa Diarra v. Melody Maddox
as 21-12323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODY M. MADDOX
Moussa Diarra v. Melody Maddox
as 21-12326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODY M. MADDOX, Dekalb County Sheriff
Moussa Diarra v. Melody Maddox
as 21-12321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA DIARRA
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODY M. MADDOX, Sheriff, Dekalb County Jail; and other Defendants, et al
Neal Maddox v. HUD
as 21-2461
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neal K. Maddox, "Scott K."
Mark Christians v. Marlin Sejnoha, Jr., et al
as 21-2458
Defendant / Appellee:
Unnamed Summit Licensed Dietitian(s), Alex Reyes, Associate Warden MDSP, Laurie Stratman, Unit Coordinator MDSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Christians
Defendant:
Mike Liedholt, South Dakota Secretary of Corrections and Darin Young, Chief Warden SDDOC prisons; all parties in their individual and official capacities
Fauntleroy v. Maddox
as 21-1567
Respondent / Appellee:
Melody M. Maddox, Sheriff, DeKalb County Jail
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
USA v. Sunnah Maddox
as 21-5426
Defendant / Appellant:
SUNNAH MADDOX, aka Mike Taylor, aka Stuart Abernathy
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kurt Mohnsam v. Jason Nemes, et al
as 21-5403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KURT K. MOHNSAM
Defendant:
MORGAN BRYAN PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN & BAYLEY, INC., an Illinois corporation, dba Huck's Food & Fuel #381, JASON MICHAEL NEMES, FULTZ, MADDOX & DICKENS, PLC, a Kentucky limited liability company, dba Fultz, Maddox, Hovious & Dickens PLC and others
USA v. Corey Maddox
as 21-11357
Defendant / Appellant:
COREY S. MADDOX
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
