Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Herring v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Cedric Oneal Herring
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Randy Akies, Corporal Hight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Cedric Oneal Herring
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Detention Officer Sergeant Falade, LT Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmonds v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Norman Simmonds
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Deputy Randy Akies, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. DUNLAP et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE MADDOX
Defendant:
DANIEL WAYNE DUNLAP and DCS TRUCKING INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Love v. Jackson County Sheriff Jail Division et al
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Love
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Jail Division, Lt. Gregory L. Bagley and Sgt. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young, E. Zejnelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
D'Mante Dontrell Anderson
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
