Cases 41 - 50 of 62
HULTS v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL OFFICIAL
as 4:2010cv00563
Plaintiff:
DAVID L HULTS
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL OFFICIAL and HIGHTOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv02199
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ltaubionjnire Holman
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Madison County Jail, Marsh and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lanier
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Hancock and E Parrish
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv01411
Plaintiff:
Gary Erris Coleman
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv01412
Plaintiff:
Gary Erris Coleman
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Rick Keith Laster
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Hancock, Madison County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Madison County et al
as 5:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kenyachta Rucker
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Madison County Jail
as 5:2009cv00573
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushbrook v. Madison County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00540
Plaintiff:
James Keith Rushbrook
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Hammonds, Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Madison County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Hancock, Chain of Command and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
