Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CALCUTT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
DANA MADSEN CALCUTT and MICHAEL CALCUTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DOE et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02500
Defendant:
KENNETH MADSEN, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
AWADH v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Acting Secretary DHS KEVIN MCALEENAN, KENNETH MADSEN, Acting Director KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Plaintiff:
FAKHRI AWADH
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03602
Petitioner:
KURT R. MADSEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03402
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KURT R. MADSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03330
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KURT R. MADSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALAMEER v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv03036
Defendant:
KENNETH CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH MADSEN and others
Plaintiff:
SINAN ALAMEER
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
