Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Drummond v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Defendant:
Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owens v. David L Moss Criminal Justice Center
as 4:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Owens
Defendant:
David L Moss Criminal Justice Center, Mail Clerk Martinez and Ms Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summit Mailing & Shipping Systems Inc v. Neopost USA Inc
as 5:2013cv00879
Plaintiff:
Summit Mailing & Shipping Systems Inc
Defendant:
Neopost USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heritage Trust Company v. Heritage Estate Service LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Heritage Trust Company
Defendant:
Heritage Estate Service LLC, Direct Mail Express Inc, Joe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mail Boxes Etc Inc v. CMS Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2006cv00130
Plaintiff:
Mail Boxes Etc Inc
Defendant:
CMS Enterprises Inc, Michael Moran and Cynthia Moran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
