Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hickman v. Bowles et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allen Hickman
Respondent:
Lee Bowles, William Haywood, Jame Tucker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Bowles et al
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allen Hickman
Defendant:
Lee Bowles, William Haywood, Jame Tucker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02709
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Patterson
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Mark Lutrell, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Defendant:
Sean Phillips, Kelly Jones, Morgan County Correctional Complex Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept., Charles W. Carpenter, Carolme Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv01691
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept., Charles W. Carpenter, Caroline Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bland v. Riverbend State Prison Administration et al
as 3:2008cv00702
Petitioner:
John C. Bland
Respondent:
Riverbend State Prison Administration, Ricky Bell, Unit 3 Staff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bland v. Riverbend State Prison Administration et al
as 3:2008mc00132
Plaintiff:
John C. Bland
Defendant:
Riverbend State Prison Administration, Ricky Bell, Unit 3 Staff and others
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Staggs et al
as 1:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
Damien Jackson
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Staggs and Turney Center mailroom staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
