Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Perry v. Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05435
Plaintiff:
Maureen Perry
Defendant:
Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Casanova v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, a/k/a Portfolio Asset Group et al
as 1:2010cv05157
Plaintiff:
Debra Casanova
Defendant:
PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, a/k/a Portfolio Asset Group and Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fellenz v. Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04629
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fellenz
Defendant:
Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC and Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pyritz v. Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04446
Plaintiff:
John Pyritz
Defendant:
Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC and Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzalez v. Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01393
Plaintiff:
Ida Gonzalez
Defendant:
Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dockery v. Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02683
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Dockery and Thomas F. Dockery
Defendant:
Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00398
Plaintiff:
Esther Brown and Esther Brown
Defendant:
Malcolm S. Gerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
