Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Darius Sledge v. United States
as 26-1490
Petitioner:
Darius Sledge, also known as Ace, also known as Man Man, also known as Frank, also known as Frank Love, also known as Gary, also known as Bill
Respondent:
United States of America
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv01222
Plaintiff:
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Amutta, bozhoushiboyueyaoye and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Floy (Gilbert)
as 25-2147
Defendant:
HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY, JOSHUA GILBERT and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Carter)
as 25-1995
Defendant:
HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY, LORENZO CARTER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Langston)
as 25-1100
Defendant:
JAHAZ LANGSTON, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Garcia)
as 25-1006
Defendant:
LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY, SHAKALE BRANTLEY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hill
as 25-2
Defendant:
DONALD HILL and Man Man
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Darius Sledge
as 24-2929
Defendant:
Darius Sledge, also known as Ace, also known as Man Man, also known as Frank, also known as Frank Love, also known as Gary, also known as Bill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Floy (Lockhart)
as 24-1904
Defendant:
JAHAZ LANGSTON, JAUWAN EDWARDS, SHAKALE BRANTLEY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Edwards)
as 24-1547
Defendant:
JAUWAN EDWARDS, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
