Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Liu v. Mandalay Bay LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Wei Liu
Defendant:
Mandalay Bay LLC, MGM Resort International and Mandalay Bay LLC doing business as Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cuara R. v. Caesars Palace et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Caesars Palace, MGM Grand Resort and Casino, Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Matthew Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al
as 23-15330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanks v. Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv00626
Defendant:
Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd., Mandalay Place, LLC doing business as Four Seasons Las Vegas and Mandalay Bay LLC doing business as Four Seasons Hotel
Plaintiff:
Lance Blanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
