Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02503
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burberry Limited, et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv10949
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited,
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" , Bixiang Lin, et al., Wen Yan Li and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Alcantara v. Golden Wok RC, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01421
Plaintiff:
Juan Alcantara
Defendant:
Jessie Caten, Golden Wok RC, Inc., Jin Mao Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lin v. Holder
as 12-3426
Petitioner:
Sen-Mao Lin, AKA Sen Miao Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 12-2144
Petitioner:
Mao Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Clemente et al v. Forever Best Time Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03561
Plaintiff:
Evelio Clemente and Ausurio Rojas
Defendant:
Forever Best Time Inc., New Best Time Inc., Mao Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
