Cases 31 - 40 of 910
RAINERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20930
Plaintiff:
MARCELO RAINERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13433
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARCELO WEST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARCELO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09298
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARCELO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alves Ramos v. Garland
as 23-1748
Petitioner:
MARCELO ALVES RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muto v. J. Crew Group, LLC
as 1:2023cv07429
Plaintiff:
MARCELO MUTO
Defendant:
J. Crew Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Flores et al v. Pizza Pete's LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06431
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Marcelo Flores
Defendant:
Pizza Pete's LLC doing business as Pizza Pete's and Frank Libretta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
