Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Ortiz v. Bell et al
as 7:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Warden Bell, C/O Corbett and Warden Harris
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2018cv00226
Defendant:
Unknown Jefferson, Unknown Bush and Unknown Corbett
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcos Ortiz v. Juaquine Pope, et al
as 17-20188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JUAQUINE POPE, in their official capacity, MICHAEL LEWIS, in their official capacity, DIVEONLEA LOTT, in their official capacity and others
Marcos Ortiz v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-40061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director of TDCJ Department of Corrections, WARDEN OF RETRIEVE UNIT, ASSISTANT WARDEN OF RETRIEVE UNIT and others
Marcos Ortiz v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-41144
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ortiz v. Stephens
as 3:2013cv00351
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Livingston et al The Clerk shall accept no further filings from Ortiz unless accompanied by the full filing fee and the sanction fee.
as 3:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Warden of Retrieve Unit, Assistant Warden of Retrieve Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00191
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Thaler
as 3:2013cv00171
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Thaler
as 4:2013cv01065
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
