Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Smith v. Willett et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Willett, Marc Galvez and Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. Doctor Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Doctor Mental Health, C.O., Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. Kitchen et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Mare A. Early and Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Kitchen, Fowler, Caseworker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. NDOC et al
as 2:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
NDOC, NDOC Medical Director and Dr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernhill Corp. v. Deveaux
as 2:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Fernhill Corp.
Defendant:
Marc Deveaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
International Payment Advisors, Ltd. v. Paysafe Services US, LLC
as 2:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
International Payment Advisors, Ltd.
Defendant:
Paysafe Services US, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Global Merchant Advisors, LLC and Paysafe Services (US) LLC
Counter Defendant:
Marc Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Earley v. Kitchen Staff ESP et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Kitchen Staff ESP, Warden ESP, Lt. ESP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrola v. Womack et al
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Edgar Burrola
Defendant:
Marc Womack and TD Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Crain v. Mercedes Benz USA et al
as 2:2022cv02080
Plaintiff:
Marc T. Crain
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, Crain Automotive Team and First Security Bank
Earley v. NDOC et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
NDOC, Cooke, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
