Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Geraghty v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05685
Plaintiff:
Marcy Geraghty
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. United HealthCare
as 3:2023cv04517
Plaintiff:
Marcy Thompson
Defendant:
United HealthCare
Labrash v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
Marci Anne Labrash
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
El et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Antonio El, Ali Mijan Muhamed White-Bey, Marie Mariam Bijou Bayo El and others
Defendant:
State of California, State Bar of California, Legal Assistance for Seniors Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Barnes v. Barnes et al
as 4:2021cv08804
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
Marcie Barnes, Antoinette Gray, Anasha Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Simon v. Maple Beach Ventures, LLC et al
as 3:2021mc80012
Respondent:
Maple Beach Ventures One, LLC and Maple Beach Ventures, LLC
Petitioner:
Marcy Simon
Simon v. Maple Beach Ventures LLC et al
as 3:2021mc80013
Respondent:
Maple Beach Ventures One, LLC, Maple Beach Ventures, LLC and Maple Beach Ventures LLC
Petitioner:
Marcy Simon
Gatlin et al v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Ryan Lee, Jeffery Collins, Francisco Llanes and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Gatlin, Clarissa Simms and Edison Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tango v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09058
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Tango
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
