Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
WALLACE v. DAVAGE et al
as 1:2021cv00980
Defendant:
ANTOINE COBB, ERIC GUNN, JIMMIE ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CONWAY v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
TERESA ANN CONWAY
Defendant:
THOMAS J. CONWAY, SR., RICHARD NIXON, RONALD REAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYNER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
DERRAN JOYNER , BETTY WYATT , M. W. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
DJO, LLC et al. v. ARVIDSON, ET AL.
as 1:2010mc00590
Respondent:
DANNY E. ARVIDSON, ANN E. ARVIDSON and MARCY J. LANDOLFO
Petitioner:
DJO, LLC and DJO, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
I-FLOW, INC. v. ARVIDSON et al
as 1:2010mc00589
Respondent:
DANNY E. ARVIDSON, ANN E. ARVIDSON and MARCY J. LANDOLFO
Petitioner:
I-FLOW, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
VALORE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2003cv01959
Plaintiff:
TERANCE J. VALORE , JUANITA R. GOLDFARB , MARY V. HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
