Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Starkman et al v. Peck et al
as 2:2022cv04355
Defendant:
Allison Maree Peck, Ian S. Peck, Allison Jurjens and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Starkman and GES Trading, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Broecker et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2021cv06387
Plaintiff:
Nicole Broecker, Michelle Martino, Gina Porcello and others
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education, Meisha Porter, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mares v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02186
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mares
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marcel v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv04404
Defendant:
Administration for Children's Services for the City of New York, Jamie Albert, Madelle Amaro and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcel v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02384
Defendant:
Madelle Amaro, Cheryl Ashby, Liyan Bao and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Solis v. Reststar, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01007
Defendant:
Bistro Cassis East, Inc., Cafe Buenos Aires, LLC, Piero Casalicchio and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Green et al v. Green et al
as 2:2007cv04112
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Green, Donna Mare Green, Robert Green and others
Defendant:
Isaac Green and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Upsala College et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2007mc00017
Debtor:
Upsala College
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Forman
Defendant:
Kyea Jones, Laurel Kerr-Leeka, Adetona Kester and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
