Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Maring v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06720
Plaintiff:
Indiia Maring
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, Tyler Couch, "John Doe Police Officers 1-200" (names and number of whom are unknown at present) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Broecker et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2021cv06387
Plaintiff:
Nicole Broecker, Michelle Martino, Gina Porcello and others
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education, Meisha Porter, United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adamides et al v. Warren et al
as 6:2021cv06613
Plaintiff:
Katherine Adamides, Mary Adams, Joseph Allman and others
Defendant:
Lovely Ann Warren, The City Of Rochester, Troy Taladay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Mares v. United States of America et al
as 6:2015cv06656
Plaintiff:
Peter Mares
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mares v. United States et al
as 6:2013cv06187
Plaintiff:
Peter Mares
Defendant:
United States of America, The United States Custom and Border Protection, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Marcel v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv04404
Defendant:
Administration for Children's Services for the City of New York, Jamie Albert, Madelle Amaro and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcel v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02384
Defendant:
Madelle Amaro, Cheryl Ashby, Liyan Bao and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marcel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
