Cases 21 - 27 of 27
DAVIS et al v. A-BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv64106
Plaintiff:
WAYNE DAVIS and MARGARET DAVIS
Defendant:
A-BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY , ACANDS, INC. , ARGO PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv63379
Plaintiff:
MARGARET DAVIS and ARTHUR DAVIS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. New York State Division for Yo
as 10-967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bruce Chapman
Defendant:
New York State Division for Youth, New York State Department of Social Services, John Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Children and Family Services of the State of New York, Cornell University, New York State College of Human Ecology at Cornell University and others
Davis et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv23354
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Davis, David Thomas Davis, David Thomas Davis and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Margaret Davis, et al. v. Raymark Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:85-CV-03471
Plaintiff:
Margaret Davis
Defendant:
Raymark Industries, Inc
Angelle et al v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Angelle, Roxanna Angelle, Roxanna Angelle and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., McKesson Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Angelle et al v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Angelle, Roxanna Angelle, Roxanna Angelle and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., McKesson Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
