Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lopez Sanchez V. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez Sanchez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Sacramento, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Margarita Lopez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Margarita Lopez v. Greenfield Care Center of South Gate, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02806
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez
Defendant:
Greenfield Care Center of South Gate, LLC, Greenfield Care Center of South Gate, LLC doing business as Greenfield Care Center of South Gate and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Blanca Margarita Lopez et al
as 2:2020cv03891
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
La Minerva Corporation, Blanca Margarita Lopez, Restaurant La Minerva and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Estate of Amilcar Perez Lopez et al v. Suhr et al
as 3:2015cv01846
Plaintiff:
Estate of Amilcar Perez Lopez , Juan Perez and Margarita Lopez Perez
Defendant:
Greg Suhr, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Regents of the University of California, The et al
as 3:2013cv02811
Plaintiff:
Medardo Lopez and Margarita Lopez
Defendant:
Regents of the University of California, The , Jose Hugo Lumbreras and Cephas John
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PGI Investments, LLC v. Dancel et al
as 3:2012cv01121
Plaintiff:
PGI Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Danilo Dancel, Zenaida Dancel and Does
Intervenor_defendant:
Margarita Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
