Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Manuela Villa v. Maricopa County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15460
Plaintiff - Appellant: MANUELA VILLA
Defendant - Appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney
Villa v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2014cv01681
Plaintiff: Manuela Villa
Defendant: Maricopa, County of , Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and William G Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puente Arizona et al v. Arpaio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01356
Plaintiff: Puente Arizona , Susan E Frederick-Gray , Sara Cervantes Arreola and others
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio , Bill Montgomery , Robert Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
We Are America/Somos America C, et al v. Maricopa County Board of Super, et al
as 13-17264
Plaintiff - Appellant: WE ARE AMERICA/SOMOS AMERICA COALITION OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA HISPANIC COMMUNITY FORUM, RAUL VIXTHA BOMAYE and others
Defendant - Appellee: MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, governing body for Maricopa County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff and WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney
NAACP, et al v. Tom Horne, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-17247
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Maricopa County Branch and NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM
Defendant - Appellee: TOM HORNE, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD and LISA WYNN, Executive Director of the Arizona Medical Board, in her official capacity
We Are America/Somos America C, et al v. Maricopa County Board of Super, et al
as 13-17193
Plaintiff - Appellee: WE ARE AMERICA/SOMOS AMERICA COALITION OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA HISPANIC COMMUNITY FORUM, RAUL VIXTHA BOMAYE and others
Defendant - Appellant: MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, governing body for Maricopa County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff and WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Plaintiff: Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant: Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff: Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant: Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Valle del Sol, et al v. State of Arizona, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-17152
Plaintiff - Appellee: C.M., a minor, COALICION DE DERECHOS HUMANOS, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, EDWARD G. RHEINHEIMER, DAISY FLORES, Gila County, Attorney in her official Capacity and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA and JANICE K. BREWER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?