Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vang v. Marinette County et al
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Yaj Vang
Defendant:
Marinett County, Marinette Police Department, Marinette Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canan v. Roberts
as 1:2022cv01518
Plaintiff:
Michael S Canan
Defendant:
Sgt Roberts and Marinette County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castaneda v. Marinette County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Marinette County Jail Administration, Marinette County Sheriff's Department and Amber Lynnwood
Plaintiff:
Christopher Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Marinette County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
Marinette County Sheriff's Department and Officer Lutze
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanidestine v. Marinette County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01776
Defendant:
Marinette County Sheriff, Marinette County Jail and John Doe
Plaintiff:
James M Vanidestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waloway v. Marinette County et al
as 2:2015cv00722
Plaintiff:
Jason A Waloway
Defendant:
Marinette County, Peshtigo Police Department, Jim Kanicula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Brey et al
as 2:2014cv01024
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Hanson
Defendant:
Allen Brey, City of Marinette, Marinette County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers, Robert et al v. Marinette County Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Rogers, A. M. R. and K. M. R.
Defendant:
Marinette County Health and Human Services and Lisa Tuozzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobishop, Jerome v. Marinette County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Kobishop
Defendant:
Marinette County Sheriff's Dept., Mendota Mental Health Center, Mike Haupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
