Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Castro et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv04000
Plaintiff:
Anabella Castro and Mario Castro
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quesada et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03436
Plaintiff:
Lucia J. Quesada and Mario Quesada
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
Zlinda Howard and Frank Mario Howard
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troncoso et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv31229
Plaintiff:
Michelle F. Troncoso and Mario D. Troncoso
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosa et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv30963
Plaintiff:
Zoraida Rosa and Mario E. Cortez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saavedra et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30590
Plaintiff:
Maria Saavedra and Mario F. Cruz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holguin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30389
Plaintiff:
Noemi Holguin and Mario Holguin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gatto et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29222
Plaintiff:
Sharon Gatto and Mario Gatto
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berrios et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24713
Plaintiff:
Lorena Berrios and Mario Berrios
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galvan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20969
Plaintiff:
Maudie Galvan and Mario Galvan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
