Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Galbreath v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02495
Plaintiff:
Marion Galbreath
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
Marion Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brite et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Brite and Marion Brite
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Donnell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04027
Plaintiff:
Marion F. O'Donnell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marion v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
LASASHA S. MARION
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marion County Board of Education et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45028
Plaintiff:
Marion County Board of Education, Wyoming County Board of Education, Kanawha County Board of Education and others
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rye v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05950
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Rye
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marion v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04001
Plaintiff:
Doreen Marion
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dozer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03753
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marion Dozer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Early
as 3:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Marion McClain Early
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Allen and F Christin Allen
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
