Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rolon et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rolon, Christopher Adamchek, Michael Aliffi and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Alletag et al
as 3:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marion Williams
Defendant:
Richard H. Alletag, D & M Carriers, LLC and Richard Alletag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rinaldi v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01579
Plaintiff:
Laura Marion Rinaldi
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Radcliffe v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01274
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Frank M. Clark, Edward J. Ludwig and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Radcliffe and Tammy Marion
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Marion v. Warden et al
as 3:2016cv01290
Petitioner:
Isaac Marion, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden, Director and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarthy v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv01163
Plaintiff:
Marion K. McCarthy
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Szollosy
as 3:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
Citgo Petroleum Corp.
Defendant:
Marion E. Szollosy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
