Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv09112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Breakell v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Maremont Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Breakell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
United States of America v. Levine et al
as 2:2016cv05467
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Linda Casano, Clerk of the Suffolk County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Franchise Contractors, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv09713
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Franchise Contractors, LLC, Marjam Supply Co., Inc., All NU Electrical Contracting Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gesualdi et al v. Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
as 1:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Louis Bisignano, Thomas F. Corbett, Anthony D'Aquila and others
Defendant:
Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marquez v. Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
as 3:2011cv00814
Plaintiff:
Efrain Marquez
Defendant:
Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy v. Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
as 2:2008cv04109
Plaintiff:
Michael T. McCarthy and Michael T. McCarthy
Defendant:
Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dayton Superior Corporation v. Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
as 2:2007cv05215
Plaintiff:
Dayton Superior Corporation
Defendant:
Marjam Supply Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
