Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moore v. The State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Mark Milton Moore and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2020cv00140
Petitioner:
Mark Milton Moore
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01286
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FILING ERROR
as 5:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
Oscar Martinez
Defendant:
Mark Adam Moore and Unique Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Moore v. Davis
as 1:2016cv01253
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Mark Vernon Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles "BPP"
as 3:2016cv00850
Plaintiff:
Mark M Moore
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles "BPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Moore
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Deac Caufield, Greg Bertrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00832
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
