Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DuRoss v. Unknown
as 2:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark DuRoss v. California State Prison, et al
as 17-16039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY DUROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor and JOHN CHIANG, State Controller
DuRoss v. California State Prison Warden
as 2:2015cv01871
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Respondent:
California State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DuRoss v. California State Prison et al
as 2:2015cv01872
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Defendant:
California State Prison, Edmund G. Brown and John Chiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark DuRoss v. California State Prison Warden, et al
as 11-15572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY DUROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON WARDEN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
DuRoss v. California State Prison-Warden et al
as 2:2010cv02225
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Defendant:
California State Prison-Warden, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark DuRoss v. Warden
as 08-16247
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY DUROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, California State Prison
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00240
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DuRoss v. Warden of California State Prison
as 2:2007cv01567
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony DuRoss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duross v. California State Prison, Warden et al
as 3:2007cv02881
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Duross
Respondent:
California State Prison, Warden and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
