Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Jones (PS) v. Fairbairn
as 1:2023cv02189
Petitioner:
Bernard Jones
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rueb v. Williams, et al
as 23-1249
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN RUEB
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS and MARK FAIRBAIRN
Lorbiecki v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1214
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY A. LORBIECKI
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Lorbiecki v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Gregory A. Lorbiecki
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Fairbairn
as 23-1004
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN L. MCKINNEY, AKA Kevin Lewayne McKinney
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK FAIRBAIRN
Wismer v. Stancil et al
as 1:2022cv03217
Plaintiff:
David A. Wismer, III
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Moses (I) Andre Stancil, Mark Fairbairn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2022cv02695
Petitioner:
Warren Dale Watson
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Fairbairn
as 1:2022cv02351
Petitioner:
Kevin Lewayne McKinney and Kevin L. McKinney
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The, Thomas Clayborne Levi and Mark Fairbairn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sorensen v. Roark et al
as 1:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Terry Sorensen
Defendant:
Jerry Roark, Maureen Sheridan, Robert Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueb v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01471
Petitioner:
Justin Rueb
Defendant:
Dr. Williams
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 - Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
