Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Case et al v. Ivey et al

as 2:2020cv00777
Plaintiff:
Scott Farr, Mark Liddle, Jim Nelson
and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Scott Harris
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Case et al v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01426
Plaintiff:
Scott Farr, Pastor Mark Liddle, Pastor Jim Nelson
and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Dr. Scott Harris
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Lucy v. Thames et al

as 1:2020cv00450
Defendant:
Frank Kruse, Gretchen Elaine Walker, Fernandez, Crane & Comb Law Firm
and others
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
Lucy v. Thames et al (MAG+)

as 2:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Sixty One St. Francis Street Inc., Gus B. Thames, Jr., Thames Jackson Harris Co.
and others
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
Phipps v. Wade et al
as 7:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Mark Robinson, Sheriff Jody Wade, Arthur Harris
and others
Plaintiff:
Renae Phipps
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Marshall

as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
Mark H. LeQuire, Ashley Rich, Hays Webb
and others
Plaintiff:
Yashica Robinson, Alabama Women's Center, Planned Parenthood Southeast Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Bibb County Alabama et al
as 7:2018cv02117
Defendant:
Bibb County Alabama, Sheriff Jody Wade, Krystal O Cash
and others
Plaintiff:
Renae Phipps
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 5:2014cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2013cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Marks v. B/R Wetumpka et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2012cv00933
Defendant:
I.G. Harris, Alabama State Bar, Alabama Department of Corrections
and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Marks
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.