Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gloria Carter v. Odis Carter, et al
as 14-10302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ODIS E. CARTER, NONYE JUDE MENES, MARK RUSSELL ROBINIUS and others
Carter v. Carter et al
as 3:2013cv02939
Plaintiff:
Gloria Carter
Defendant:
Odis E Carter, Nonye Jude Menes, Mark Russell Robinius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Vacation Communications Group, LLC et al
as 1:2013mc00467
Defendant:
Tammie Lynn Cline, Sheldon Lee Cohen, Mark Russell Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs
Receiver:
Brian A. McDowell
Jeff Compton v. Aker Pusnes AS, et al
as 11-20478
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MPF HOLDINGS US, L.L.C., MPF CORPORATION, LIMITED and MPF-01, LIMITED
Appellant:
JEFF COMPTON, Litigation Trustee of the MPF Litigation Trust
Appellee:
AKER PUSNES AS, formerly known as Aker KV Aerner Pusnes AS, BACHMAN TRUST COMPANY, now known as Ardel Trust Company, BRIAN ANDERSON and others
Jeff Compton v. Aker Pusnes AS, et al
as 11-90008
Debtor:
In re: MPF HOLDINGS US, L.L.C., MPF CORPORATION, LIMITED and MPF-01, LIMITED
Petitioner:
JEFF COMPTON, Litigation Trustee of the MPF Litigation Trust
Respondent:
AKER PUSNES AS, formerly known as Aker KV Aerner Pusnes AS, BACHMAN TRUST COMPANY, now known as Ardel Trust Company, BRIAN ANDERSON and others
McKee v. USA
as 1:2007cv00206
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Russell McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McKee v. USA
as 1:2007cv00200
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Russell McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
