Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. Markovitz
as 2:2023mc51361
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alan Markovitz
Petitioner:
Charles Blackwell
Pearson et al v. Top Flight Entertainment, LTD et al
as 2:2021cv10258
Plaintiff:
Ashley Pearson and Veronica Adamson
Defendant:
M & M Zin Enterprises, Inc., ABCDE Operating, LLC, Alan Markovitz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe v. The Coliseum, Incorporated d/b/a The Coliseum et al
as 2:2020cv12981
Defendant:
Alan Markovitz and The Coliseum, Incorporated d/b/a The Coliseum
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe v. The Coliseum, Incorporated d/b/a The Coliseum et al
as 2:2020cv12982
Defendant:
Alan Markovitz and The Coliseum, Incorporated d/b/a The Coliseum
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe v. The Coliseum, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10845
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Paris
Defendant:
Alan Markovitz, John Doe and The Coliseum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Doe v. TOP FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT, LTD., d.b.a. Flight Club, a Michigan corporation et al
as 2:2020cv10851
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Paris
Defendant:
TOP FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT, LTD., d.b.a. Flight Club, a Michigan corporation, Alan Markovitz and John Doe
John Doe 1 et al v. The Flight Club et al
as 4:2019cv11805
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Defendant:
The Flight Club and Alan Markovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Fawaz v. ABCDE Operating, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12068
Plaintiff:
Mike Fawaz
Defendant:
ABCDE Operating, L.L.C. and Alan Markovitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morad v. ABCDE Operating, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv11704
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morad
Defendant:
ABCDE Operating, L.L.C. and Alan Markovitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
