Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Traficanti et al.
as 4:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
Marquez Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony Traficanti, David Ditzler, Coral Rimedio-Righetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03841
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Marquez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04564
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Javierto Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, DWO Hobbs, Major Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marquez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Camille Marquez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. May et al
as 3:2021cv01463
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Inspector Jenkins, U.M.C. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Warden Ron Erdos, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Unit Manager Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
