Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JUSTICE, II v. PLANTRONICS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01861
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II and JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Defendant:
PLANTRONICS, INC., ROBERT C HAGERTY, MARV TSEU and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Marshall et al v. Prestamos CDFI LLC
as 5:2022mc00025
Plaintiff:
ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL PRONSKY and PARIS TOWNSEND
Defendant:
PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC
Petitioner:
Chicanos Por La Causa Incorporated
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
In Re:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
USA v. Marshall Onuorah
as 21-3338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARSHALL ONUORAH
Stephanie Higgins, et al v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc
as 21-3286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE HIGGINS, for herself and all others similarly situated, SHERRI KRAMER, MEGHAN TANEYHILL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE INC
James Malarik, et al v. Beaver County Jail Administrat, et al
as 21-3174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID LYONS, SR. and ERNEST THORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL COMMISSARY, DEPARTMENT, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL MAILROOM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
