Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Weddington v. Baltimore County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2021cv03031
Petitioner:
Robert Clifford Weddington
Respondent:
Baltimore County Circuit Court and Judge Jan Marshall Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2021cv02763
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Stewart and Charles B. Stewart-Bey
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Quincy L. Booth and Lennard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nivens v. Henslee et al
as 1:2020cv02898
Defendant:
Jessica R. Bancroft, The Public Defenders Office and Marshall T. Henslee
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chase, Jr. v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Eastern Correctional Institution, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Chase, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Marshall v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01534
Petitioner:
Johnathan Adrian Marshall
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Faulkner v. United States Marshal Services
as 1:2020cv00453
Respondent:
United States Marshal Services
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marshall v. USA - 2255
as 8:2019cv03531
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Plaintiff:
Andracos Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Melvin v. Stulis et al
as 1:2019cv03431
Defendant:
Carolyn Murray, Officer Mrs. Vernusa Pace, Warden Ms. Tina Stulis and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza-Ovalle v. Detention Officer Armstrong et al
as 1:2019cv00895
Plaintiff:
Luis Garza-Ovalle
Defendant:
Warden Renee Alexander, United States Marshall's Office, Chesapeak Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00586
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
