Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rayburn v. Cass County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00169
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Meyer, Cass County Sheriff's Department, U.S. Marshal Meier and others
Plaintiff:
Kristina Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00234
Defendant:
Niel Fulton, Ralf Erickson, United States Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
William Randall Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panzo v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2018cv00170
Defendant:
Heart of America Treatment Center and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Windy L. Panzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fly v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak, J and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. US Probation Officer et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
US Probation Officer, Daniel Hovland and U S Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bagola v. U S Marshal
as 3:2013cv00082
Petitioner:
Valentino Bagola
Respondent:
U S Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hunter v. United States Marshal
as 3:2013cv00058
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. United States Marshal
as 3:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
