Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Blackmon v. Lenawee County Health Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv10364
Plaintiff: Kimberly Blackmon
Defendant: Lenawee County Health Department, Martha Hall, Blissfield Community Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12928
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moses Moore, et al v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al
as 08-4553
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MOSES MOORE, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, ROSS J. SATTERFIELD, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, BART J. KOCHIS, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: JAMES HALL, JR., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and WILLIAM WANDRYCH, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and MORTON RETIRED EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE PLAN
Defendant - Appellee: DOES 1-20
Moses Moore, et al v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al
as 08-4545
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MOSES MOORE, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, ROSS J. SATTERFIELD, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, BART J. KOCHIS, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES HALL, JR., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and WILLIAM WANDRYCH, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and MORTON RETIRED EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE PLAN
Defendant: DOES 1-20

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?