Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gold v. Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C. et al
as 1:2017cv04650
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Gold
Defendant:
Alan Lescht & Associates, P.C. , Stanley Chinitz and Alan Lescht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golds v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03943
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Mikhail Goncharov, Police Officer Andrew Ho and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Golds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gold v. American Medical Alert Corp.
as 1:2014cv05485
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Gold
Defendant:
American Medical Alert Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Metropolitan Insurance
as 10-1007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Darren Murray, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Martin Gold, Mary A. Devito and others
Respondent:
Robert H. Benmosche, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group, Gerald Clark, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group, Joan Ganz Cooney, Nonparty Directors and Officers Group and others
Movant - Appellant:
Lawrence Kuczynski
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife, Inc.
-AKT Murray v. Metropolitan Ins, et al
as 9:2000cv02258
Respondent:
Curtis H. Barnette, Paulette Beliunas, Robert H. Benmosche and others
Objector:
Thomas Sterrett Bell, Christopher Mueller, John J. Pentz and others
Movant:
Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, Goldman, Sachs & Co., and New York State Insurance Department
Special Master:
Richard J. Davis
Consol Plaintiff:
Mary A. Devito, Michael A. Giannattasio, Martin Gold and others
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Darren F. Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Golds v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv01414
Plaintiff:
Martin Golds
Defendant:
The City of New York and "John & Jane Does 1-4"
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Golds v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv03817
Plaintiff:
Martin Golds
Defendant:
City of New York, Areher, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
