Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Frantzy v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00899
Petitioner:
Morisset Frantzy
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Michael Philips, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frantzy v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv06863
Petitioner:
Morisset Frantzy
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Michael Philips, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Villier v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00120
Petitioner:
Maxo Villier
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder , Michael Phillips , Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00809
Petitioner:
Wycliffe Warner
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Michael Phillips, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tota v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00810
Petitioner:
Cleon Kevin Tota
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Michael Phillips, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zhao v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00511
Petitioner:
Xin Qiang Zhao
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Janet Napolitano, Michael Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cousins v. Heron et al
as 6:2010cv06280
Petitioner:
Danville Cousins
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Michael Philips and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ricketts v. Herron
as 10-1935
Petitioner - Appellant:
Junior Ricketts
Respondent - Appellee:
Martin Heron, Facilities Director, Michael Philips, District Director Dro Field Office and Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the Unites States
Grant v. Heron et al
as 1:2010cv00359
Petitioner:
Andre Grant
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Michael Philips and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Heron et al
as 1:2010cv00337
Petitioner:
Conroy Smith
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Michael Philips and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
